A user-friendly, frequently updated reference guide that aligns with international guidelines and protocols.
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/ Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Introduction:
It is a neoplasm of monomorphic small, round B-lymphocytes in the peripheral blood, bone marrow and lymph nodes, admixed with prolymphocytes and para immunoblasts, usually expressing CD5 and CD23.
Epidemiology:
It comprises of 6-7% of all NHL and 25% of all leukemias
> 50years commonly affected (Median age 72years)
Male to female ratio is 2:1
Incidence- 4.2/1lac population per year
Incidence is low but prevalence is high due to indolent course of disease
Etiology:Not known. Suspected agents include:
Antigens promoting division of precursor cells
Environmental agents associated with farming
Increased exposure to electromagnetic field
Ionizing radiations
Familial- Risk in first degree relative is 2-7 times higher
Pathogenesis:
Activation of BCR pathway through
PI3k delta
Spleen tyrosine kinase
Bruton tyrosine kinase
Activation of BCR pathway promotes B cell development, survival and proliferation
Defective apoptosisdue to over expression of anti-apoptotic proteins including bcl-2, mcl-1, bak and X linked inactivator of apoptotic protein (XIAP)
Decreased expression of pro-apoptotic protein- bax
Autocrine and paracrine networks involving
B Cell activation factor
A proliferation inducing ligand
VEGF
IL-4
CD 40
Role of micro-environment- Stromal cells provide survival signals- Cytokines, chemokines, CD40, B cell activationg factor of TNF family (BAFF), integrins and components of extra cellular matrix.
Clinical Features:
Most of the patients are asymptomatic
Anemia (Easy fatigability) in late stages. Causes of anemia include
Marrow infiltration
Myelosuppressive effects of chemotherapy
Inhibitory cytokines
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia
Hypersplenism
Poor nutritional status
Pure red cell aplasia
Constitutional symptoms- Loss of weight, anorexia, profound fatigue, drenching night sweats and fever
Other extranodal site involvement- Proptosis, involvement of prostate, gonads, percardium, lungs, GIT
CNS manifestation due to infiltration- Headache, meningitis, cranial nerve palsy, coma
Mediastinal syndrome
Enlargement of tonsils
Repeated infections due to impaired immunoglobulin production, T cell dysfunction, tumor cell elaboration of immunosuppressive cytokines (TGF-beta, CD27), reduced complement levels and neutropenia
Exaggerated response to insect bites- especially mosquitoes
Chronic rhinitis- Due to nasal involvement by CLL cells
Complications:
Ritcher’s syndrome
It is transformation of an isolated lymph node affected by CLL into an aggressive diffuse large B cell lymphoma
Most commonly it occurs due to an additional p53 mutation.
Other genetic changes include del (11q), Overexpression of c-myc, deletion of Rb1
It presents with fever, increasing lymphadenopathy, weight loss and abdominal pain. Rarely there can be hepatomegaly and splenomegaly.
It is seen in 3-5% cases of CLL
Immunosuppression with fludarabine triggers this transformation by causing CD4 + lymphopenia
There is evidence of involvement of EBV in pathogenesis (LMP is demonstrated by IHC and EBER by FISH).
Diagnosis requires lymph node biopsy
Prognosis- Poor
Treatment- Same as DLBCL
Other transformations:
Prolymphocytic lymphoma/ leukemia
Paraimmunoblastic variant
Hodgkin disease
Pre B Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Investigations:
Hemogram
Normocytic normochromic anemia
Leukocyte count is markedly increased (>2 lac / cmm)
Marked lymphocytosis - > 90% are mature lymphocytes. They are small, monotonous cells having round nuclei; block type chromatin clumping and scanty blue cytoplasm. Some contain intracytoplasmic globules or crystalline rod shaped inclusions.
Smear cells / Smudge cells / Basket cells – they are distorted cells which are formed during smear preparation.
Prolymphocytes are < 2%. Their increased number correlates with aggressive disease course, p53 mutation and trisomy 12. If these cells are >10% then the condition is called Chronic lymphocytic leukemia-prolymphocytic leukemia (CLL-PLL)
Neutropenia.
Platelets – Reduced counts
Bone Marrow Aspiration
Cellularity is increased
Mature lymphocyte count in bone marrow is > 40%
Reduced myeloid as well as erythroid precursors.
Trephine biopsy
Heavy replacement of fat spaces and hematopoietic cells by mature lymphocytes
Tumor cell infiltration is paratrabecular nodular / interstitial / diffuse / combination of these.
Diffuse pattern with no residual fat indicates advanced CLL (Stage C of Binet)
Proliferation center- Small cluster of prolymphocyte appearing cells (these cells express high levels of CD 20 and other B cell surface antigens)
The value of bone marrow trephine biopsies in CLL
Prognostic feature: Diffusely packed BM has poor prognosis
Clarify the nature of cytopenias
IHC can be done on biopsy sample if differential diagnosis includes other low grade NHL
Lymph Node biopsy
Effacement of architecture
Pseudo follicular pattern of regularly distributed pale areas containing large cells in a dark background of small cells.
Predominant cell is small lymphocyte, which is, slightly larger than a normal lymphocyte.
Round nucleuswith clumped chromatin. Low mitotic activity.Cytoplasm is scanty and clear.
Immunophenotyping (IHC/ Flow cytometry)
Positive: CD5, CD23, CD19, CD20, CD22, CD79a, CD43, CD11C, IgM, BCL2, CD 45, BOB 1, OCT 2, PAX 5
Coexpression of CD 5 and CD 23 is typical of CLL
Weak expression of Surface immunoglobulin kappa/lambda
Negative for – CD10, Cyclin D1, FMC7, CD79b, CD 103, CD30, CD138, BCL1, BCL6
ZAP (Zeta associated protein) 70 and CD38 expression indicates presence of unmutatedIgVH gene and aggressive nature of disease and shorter survival. CD49d is also associated with poor prognosis.
Cytogenetics/FISH
Not required in patients with low Rai score who are not being treated.
Before treatment cytogenetics should be done/ repeated as new mutations can appear
Conventional metaphase cytogenetics is difficult in CLL as a result of very low proliferative activity of leukemic cells.
Cytokine/CpGoligonucleotide stimulation may be utilized to promote metaphase
Poor prognosis with- del 13q (miR-16, ARTLS1 and miR-15a gene), del 11q (ATM gene), del 17p (TP53gene)
FISH for t(11:14) must be done in all cases to rule out mantle cell lymphoma
FISH is better option to detect above abnormalities
Mutation status of Antigen receptor genes by sequencing
Rearrangement of Ig heavy and light chain genes (Ig VH genes)- Unmutated status is associated with poor prognosis
Stage C- Hb< 10 g/dL or Platelet count < 100 x 109 /L
Prognosis:
(Evaluation of prognostic markers is not recommended in whom there is no indication of treatment. Identification of TP53 abnormality is not an indication for treatment)
Poor Prognostic Markers
Advanced Rai stage
Advanced age
Poor performance status
Associated comorbidities
Initial lymphocytosis>50,000/cmm
Diffuse bone marrow involvement
Rapid lymphocyte doubling time < 12 months
High β2 microglobulin level
Unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region
High thymidine kinase, metalloprotease 9, IL8, IL6, SCD44, SUCAM1, SCD27
Trisomy 12 with atypical morphology
Complex karyotype
CD-38 positivity in >30% lymphocytes
ZAP 70 positivity
Increased serum levels of sCD23, TNF alpha, LDH
Mutations in NOTCH 1, SF3B1, BIRC3 genes, genes of lipoprotein lipase, dysintegrin, metalloprotease 29,
11q 22-23 deletion with extensive lymphadenopathy
TP53 abnormalities (Chr. 17p21)
Increased serum levels of CD23, TNF &thymidine kinase
Better Prognosis
Abnormalities of 13q14
Mutations in Ig genes variable regions
IgD+/ IgM- phenotype
Overall
CLL has an indolent course
5 year survival is 51%
Overall median survival is 7 years
Disease is not curable by conventional therapies
CLL International prognostic index:
Variable
Adverse factor
Score
Age
>65 years
1
Clinical stage
Binet B/C or Rai I-IV
1
17p deletion/ TP53 mutation
Deleted/ Mutated
4
IGHV mutation status
Unmutated
2
Beta 2 microglobulin level
>3.5mg/L
2
Score
Risk
OS at 5 years
0-1
Low
93.2%
2-3
Intermediate
79.3%
4-6
High
63.3%
7-10
Very high
23.3%
Indications for Treatment:
(These criteria apply to both previously untreated and relapsed patients)
Eligibility for clinical trial (treatment based on newer prognostic markers)
Symptomatic patents- Fever, weight loss (>10% in last 6 months)
Fatigue with PS 2 or worse
Obstructive or advanced lymphadenopathy
Massive splenomegaly (>6cm below costal line)
Stage III or IV disease i.e. Hemoglobin <10gm/dL or Platelet count <1lac/cmm(Which is due to marrow infiltration and not due to other causes)
Lymphocyte doubling time <6months (Baseline ALC must be >30,000/cmm)
Complications- Recurrent infections, threatened end organ damage, transformation to DLBCL
AIHA or ITP which are unresponsive to steroids
Paraneoplastic symptoms which are not responding to traditional treatment. Ex: Insect bite hypersensitivity, vasculitis, myositis
Pretreatment Work-up (Do if indication for treatment present):
History
B-Symptoms
Examination
LN:
Spleen:
WHO P. S.
BSA
IHC/Flow cytometry
CD 38
ZAP 70
BMA and Bx
Hemoglobin
TLC, DLC
Platelet count
Peripheral smear
Reticulucyte count
DCT
LFT: Bili- T/D SGPT: SGOT:Albumin: Globulin:
Creatinine
Electrolytes: Na: K: Ca:Mg: PO4:
Uric acid
LDH
β2 microglobulin
HIV
HBsAg
HCV
UPT
Quantitative Ig
CpG stimulated Cytogenetics
CT (CAP)
FISH
+12
del(11q)
del(13q)
del(17p)
t (11:14)
TP53 Sequencing
IGHV Mutation
Prognostic score
ECHO(If anthracyclines planned)LVEF- %
Chemotherapy consent after informing about disease, prognosis, cost of therapy, side effects, hygiene, food and contraception
Fertility preservation
PICC line insertion and Chest X ray after line insertion
Tumor board meeting and decision
Attach supportive care drug sheet
Inform primary care physician
Treatment Plan:
SLL- Localised disease-Loco-regional RT (24-30 Gy)- then oberve
Rest all SLL and all CLL:
Response Criteria:
To be assessed 2 months after completion of treatment
Criteria for complete response: (All criteria are met with no symptoms)
Group A (Based on tumor load)
Lymphadenopathy- None >1.5cm
No hepatomegaly
No splenomegaly
BM- Normocellular with <30% lymphocytes, no B lymphoid nodules (Hypocellular marrow indicates complete response but incomplete marrow recovery)
Absolute lymphocyte count <4000/cmm
Group B (Based on marrow function)
Platelet count (unsupported)- >1lac/cmm
Hemoglobin (unsupported)- >11gm/dL
ANC (unsupported))- >1500/cmm
About Each Modality of Treatment:
Ibrutinib
Orally active irreversible inhibitor of BTK
In patients with CLL- Dose- 420mg- OD
After starting, there can be transient increase in lymphocyte count (may persist for several weeks)
Avoid co-administration of CYP3A inhibitors
Side effects- Bleeding episodes, diarrhea, skin rashes
Chemotherapies
Refer to NHL section
Allo HSCT in CLL
Indication-
No response/ Relapse after BCR pathway inhibitor
Eligible patients with Ritcher transformation
With related HSCT- CR rate- 55%
Supportive Care:
Treatment of AIHA/ITP
Prednisolone- 1mg/kg/day (for 2-6 weeks then taper over 3 months)
Figure- 6.2.2- Chronic lymphocytic leukemia- Bone marrow biopsy
Recent advances:
Fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax for first-line treatment of CLL
CAPTIVATE is an international phase 2 study in patients aged ≤70 years with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Patients received 3 cycles of ibrutinib lead-in then 12 cycles of ibrutinib plus venetoclax (oral ibrutinib [420 mg/d]; oral venetoclax [5-week ramp-up to 400 mg/d]). Of the 159 patients enrolled and treated, 136 were without del(17p). The primary endpoint was met, with a CR rate of 56% in patients without del(17p), significantly higher than the prespecified 37% minimum rate . In the all-treated population, CR rate was 55%. First-line ibrutinib plus venetoclax represents the first all-oral, once-daily, chemotherapy-free regimen for patients with CLL. Fixed duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax achieved deep, durable responses and promising PFS, including in patients with high-risk features.
Zanubrutinib or Ibrutinib in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
In present study patients with relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL were randomy assigned to receive zanubrutinib or ibrutinib until the occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. At a median follow-up of 29.6 months, zanubrutinib was found to be superior to ibrutinib with respect to progression-free survival among 652 patients. The safety profile of zanubrutinib was better than that of ibrutinib.
Compared with ibrutinib, zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTKi, which provides improved BTK occupancy across disease-relevant tissues with greater kinase selectivity. In present randomized phase 3 study, zanubrutinib was compared head-to-head with ibrutinib as treatment for R/R CLL/SLL. With a median follow-up of 29.6 mo zanubrutinib PFS, assessed by independent review committee, was superior to ibrutinib.
First-Line Venetoclax Combinations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
In this study 926 patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, to receive six cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (fludarabine–cyclophosphamide–rituximab or bendamustine–rituximab) or 12 cycles of venetoclax–rituximab, venetoclax–obinutuzumab, or venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib. The primary end points were undetectable minimal residual disease (sensitivity, <10−4 [i.e., <1 CLL cell in 10,000 leukocytes]) as assessed by flow cytometry in peripheral blood at month 15 and progression-free survival. At month 15, the percentage of patients with undetectable minimal residual disease was significantly higher in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab group. Three-year progression-free survival was 90.5% in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib group and 75.5% in the chemoimmunotherapy group.
Ibrutinib in combination with rituximab is highly effective in treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with steroid refractory and relapsed autoimmune cytopenias
This multicenter study investigated the use of ibrutinib and rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Among the 50 recruited patients, 74% achieved a complete response and 21.7% achieved a partial response after induction treatment. The median time to hemoglobin normalization was 85 days. In terms of CLL response, 19% achieved a complete response, 4% had stabilization, and 78% had a partial response. The combination of ibrutinib and rituximab demonstrated efficacy as a second-line treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory AIHA/PRCA and underlying CLL.
Idelalisib plus rituximab versus ibrutinib in the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
This study analyzed 171 patients treated with R-idela and 244 patients treated with ibrutinib. The ibrutinib group showed significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to the R-idela group. Furthermore, ibrutinib demonstrated better tolerability, with fewer cases of treatment discontinuation due to toxicity or CLL progression.
Obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax for untreated CLL with del(17p)/TP53mut
The CLL2-GIVe trial examined the triple combination of obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax (GIVe regimen) in 41 previously untreated patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation. After a median observation time of 38.4 months, the complete remission rate at cycle 15 was 58.5%. The 36-month progression-free survival was 79.9%, and the 36-month overall survival was 92.6%. Adverse events included neutropenia (48.8%, grade ≥3) and infections (19.5%, grade ≥3), with cardiovascular toxicity (atrial fibrillation and hypertension) occurring at rates of 2.4% and 4.9%, respectively. Adverse events were most common during induction and decreased over time. The regimen appears promising as a first-line treatment with a manageable safety profile for high-risk CLL patients.
Sustained remissions in CLL after frontline FCR treatment with very-long-term follow-up
Chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) has shown durable remissions, particularly in patients with mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene (IGHV-M). In a study initiated in 1999 with a median follow-up of 19.0 years, patients with IGHV-M had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.6 years compared to 4.2 years for those with unmutated IGHV (IGHV-UM). While disease progression beyond 10 years was uncommon, therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (tMNs) occurred in 6.3% of patients, emphasizing the importance of a risk-benefit assessment when considering FCR for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), weighing potential functional cure against the risk of late relapses and serious secondary malignancies.
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Therapy Guided by Measurable Residual Disease
In a phase 3, multicenter, randomized trial involving patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax was compared to fludarabine–cyclophosphamide–rituximab (FCR). The ibrutinib–venetoclax group showed improved progression-free survival compared to the FCR group, with a hazard ratio of 0.13. The risk of death was also lower in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group. MRD-directed ibrutinib–venetoclax therapy resulted in undetectable MRD in a significant percentage of patients. Although the risk of infection was similar, the ibrutinib–venetoclax group had a higher percentage of patients with cardiac serious adverse events. The study suggests that MRD-directed ibrutinib–venetoclax is a promising treatment for untreated CLL.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2310063
Third-generation anti-CD19 CAR T cells for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia
In this phase 1/2 trial, nine heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory CLL received third-generation HD-CAR-1 CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy. With successful in-house manufacturing, 67% of patients achieved complete remission by day 90, and 83% of these achieved undetectable MRD. After 27 months of follow-up, the 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 30% and 69%, respectively. The therapy showed promising efficacy with minimal toxicity, suggesting HD-CAR-1 as a viable option for r/r CLL.
Disclaimer: Information provided on this website is only for medical education purposes and not intended as medical advice. Although authors have made every effort to provide up-to-date information, the recommendations should not be considered standard of care. Responsibility for patient care resides with the doctors on the basis of their professional license, experience, and knowledge of the individual patient. For full prescribing information, including indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and adverse effects, please refer to the approved product label. Neither the authors nor publisher shall be liable or responsible for any loss or adverse effects allegedly arising from any information or suggestion on this website. This website is written for use of healthcare professionals only; hence person other than healthcare workers is advised to refrain from reading the content of this website.