A user-friendly, frequently updated reference guide that aligns with international guidelines and protocols.
Introduction:
Epidemiology:
Pathogenesis: Multistep mutagenesis
Germline ATM and CHK2 mutation in Naive B lymphocytes
↓
t(11:14) with IGH::CCND1 fusionresults in overexpression of cyclin D1
↓
Activation of cyclin D1 dependent kinase pathway
↓
Loss of cell cycle suppressive effect of RB1 and p27, resulting in cell growth and malignant transformation
↓
In Situ MCL
↓
ATM and CHK2 mutation leading to increased genomic instability
↓
Classical MCL
↓
p16/CDK4/Rb/ARF/MdM2/p53 mutations leading to increased proliferation
↓
Blastoid MCL
Classification:
Clinical Features:
Investigations:
Criteria for Diagnosis:
Cyclin D1-positive MCL
Cyclin D1-negative MCL
Leukaemic non-nodal mantle cell lymphoma
Prognosis: Simplified MCL International Prognostic Index
Points | Age in yrs | ECOG PS | LDH (iU/L) | WBC Count (/cmm) |
0 | <50 | 0-1 | <0.67 | <6700 |
1 | 50-59 | - | 0.67-0.99 | 6700-9999 |
2 | 60-69 | 2-4 | 1-1.49 | 10,000- 14,999 |
3 | >69 | - | >1.5 | >15,000 |
Points | Risk category |
0-3 | Low |
4-5 | Intermediate |
6-11 | High |
Pretreatment Work-up:
Treatment Plan:
About each modality of treatment:
Relapsed/ Refractory disease:
Monitoring After Treatment/ Follow-up:
Related Disorders:
Recent Advances:
Ibrutinib plus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Untreated Mantle-Cell Lymphoma
In a recent study elderly patients were given ibrutinib (560 mg, administered orally once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects) or placebo, plus six cycles of bendamustineand rituximab. Patients with an objective response received rituximab maintenance therapy, administered every 8 weeks for up to 12 additional doses. Among 523 patients, 261 were randomly assigned to receive ibrutinib and 262 to receive placebo. The median progression-free survival was 80.6 months in the ibrutinib group and 52.9 months in the placebo group. Overall survival was similar in the two groups.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2201817
Ibrutinib improves survival compared with chemotherapy in mantle cell lymphoma with central nervous system relapse
Central nervous system (CNS) relapse of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare phenomenon with dismal prognosis, where no standard therapy exists. Ibrutinib is effective in relapsed/refractory MCL and penetrates the blood–brain barrier. Study concluded that Ibrutinib is associated with superior survival compared with BBB-penetrating chemotherapy in patients with CNS relapse of MCL and should be considered as a therapeutic option.
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2022015560
Pirtobrutinib in Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Pretreated Mantle-Cell Lymphoma
This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of pirtobrutinib, a reversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) who had been previously treated with covalent BTK inhibitors (cBTKi). In a phase I/II trial, 90 patients were included in the primary efficacy cohort. The overall response rate (ORR) was 57.8%, including 20.0% complete responses. The median duration of response was 21.6 months, with favorable rates at 6 and 12 months. Common adverse events included fatigue, diarrhea, and dyspnea, with few grade ≥3 events. Pirtobrutinib demonstrated durable efficacy and tolerability in cBTKi-pretreated MCL patients.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.00562
Bendamustine–rituximab for older, untreated mantle cell lymphoma patients
In older patients (aged 60 and above) with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) uniformly treated with bendamustine and rituximab, a comprehensive analysis was conducted to identify prognostic factors. The study revealed that blastoid cytology had an hazard ratio of 4.21 compared to classic cytology. Patients classified as high risk by both s-MIPI and MCL35 had the poorest prognosis, while those with high risk by either had a moderate but clinically relevant prognosis. The study suggests that a combination of s-MIPI, MCL35, and stringent cytological evaluation may effectively stratify risk in older MCL patients for future clinical trials.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19153
Real-world effectiveness and safety of ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma
This post-marketing surveillance study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In the effectiveness analysis set (n = 202), the overall response rate was 59.9%, 52-week progression-free survival was 47.5%, and overall survival was 69.3%. Safety analysis in 248 patients (median age 74.0 years) showed an overall incidence of adverse events at 74.6%, with a similar distribution between patients with 1 versus more than 1 prior line of therapy. The most common adverse event was decreased platelet count (all grades; 10.4%). Atrial fibrillation occurred in 2.0% of patients.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-023-03687-8
Predictive value of minimal residual disease for efficacy of Rituximab maintenance in mantle cell lymphoma
The study aimed to assess the impact of minimal residual disease (MRD) status on the efficacy of rituximab (R)-maintenance in older patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with immunochemotherapy. MRD monitoring was performed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) following EuroMRD guidelines. Results showed that R-maintenance was highly effective in patients who were MRD-negative after induction, leading to significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, MRD-positive patients had less benefit from R-maintenance, indicating the need for more effective consolidation strategies in this group to improve long-term outcomes.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.0089
Lisocabtagene Maraleucel in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
The study presents primary analysis results from the TRANSCEND NHL 001 trial's mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cohort, focusing on lisocabtagenemaraleucel (CD19 directed CAR T Cell) treatment in relapsed/refractory MCL patients. Of the 104 enrolled patients, 83 were included in the efficacy analysis. Lisocabtagenemaraleucel exhibited an objective response rate (ORR) of 83.1% and a complete response (CR) rate of 72.3%, with median duration of response and progression-free survival at 15.7 and 15.3 months, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly manageable, with neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia being the most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs. Notably, the incidence of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events (NEs) was low, indicating liso-cel's efficacy and tolerability in heavily pretreated R/R MCL patients.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.022
Bortezomib, rituximab, high-dose cytarabine and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma
In a phase-III trial for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients ineligible for or relapsed after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), rituximab, high-dose cytarabine, and dexamethasone with bortezomib (R-HAD + B) demonstrated superior efficacy over R-HAD alone. Median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 12 vs. 2.6 months (p=0.045), with higher overall and complete response rates in the R-HAD + B group. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant treatment effect in patients >65 years and those without previous ASCT. Toxicity primarily comprised hematological adverse events, with more leukocytopenia and lymphocytopenia in the R-HAD + B group, indicating bortezomib's potential as a therapeutic option in r/r MCL.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02254-2
Rituximab, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in relapsed or refractory indolent and mantle cell lymphoma
This phase I/II trial aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oxaliplatin in combination with rituximab and gemcitabine (R-GemOx) and evaluate its efficacy in relapsed or refractory (r/r) indolent lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The MTD was established at 70 mg/m² of oxaliplatin after dose-limiting toxicities occurred at 80 mg/m². Among 46 evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 72%, missing the primary study aim. After a median follow-up of 7.9 years, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.0 year, and overall survival (OS) was 2.1 years. While R-GemOx showed decent efficacy, novel therapies have largely replaced chemotherapy in this setting, though R-GemOx may still be viable for late relapses or as bridging to CAR-T-cell therapy in MCL.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-05689-w
Outcomes of venetoclax-ibrutinib therapy in mantle cell lymphoma
In this trial, 24 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients (23 relapsed/refractory) received ibrutinib and venetoclax daily. After over 7 years of follow-up, the 7-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 30% and overall survival (OS) was 43%. Eight patients with MRD-negative complete remission (CR) underwent elective treatment interruption (ETI), with 4 experiencing disease recurrence. Two of 3 reattained CR on retreatment. Serious adverse events were rare beyond 56 weeks. The combination showed long-term durable responses with a favorable safety profile, supporting treatment interruption feasibility while maintaining disease control.
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2023023388
Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (KRD) in BTKi relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma
This phase II trial evaluated the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) combination in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients resistant or intolerant to Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). The 12-month overall survival was only 13%, with an overall response rate of 19%. Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 35% of patients, leading to early trial termination.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19617
An Initiative of
1299, 2nd Floor, Shanta Nivas,
Beside Hotel Swan Inn, Off J.M.Road, Shivajinagar
Pune - 411005
Maharashtra – India
CIN: U85190PN2022PTC210569
Email: admin@howitreat.in
Disclaimer: Information provided on this website is only for medical education purposes and not intended as medical advice. Although authors have made every effort to provide up-to-date information, the recommendations should not be considered standard of care. Responsibility for patient care resides with the doctors on the basis of their professional license, experience, and knowledge of the individual patient. For full prescribing information, including indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and adverse effects, please refer to the approved product label. Neither the authors nor publisher shall be liable or responsible for any loss or adverse effects allegedly arising from any information or suggestion on this website. This website is written for use of healthcare professionals only; hence person other than healthcare workers is advised to refrain from reading the content of this website.